What is the remedy for missing an optional trigger with no consequence?

Enhance your knowledge of MTG Judge Infraction Procedure Guide with our specialized test. Tackle multiple choice questions with insightful hints and detailed explanations. Prepare effectively for certification.

Choosing to assume the player has chosen not to perform the action is accurate when dealing with a missed optional trigger that has no consequence. In this scenario, the assumption reflects how the game treats optional triggers: if they are missed and there is no negative impact on the game state, it is as though the player decided not to use the trigger intentionally.

This approach aligns with the general principles of Magic: The Gathering, where maintaining the integrity of player choices and the intended game flow is vital. By assuming the player opted out of triggering the effect, it avoids unnecessary penalties and keeps the game progressing smoothly, respecting the decisions players make.

Other options do not fit the situation as well. Assuming the trigger resolved would misrepresent the missed decision, as it implies the effect took place when it did not. Issuing a warning would be more appropriate if the trigger had serious consequences or if the situation was recurrent, but for a trigger with no consequence, this is not warranted. Applying a game loss penalty is overly severe for a missed optional trigger with no impact, thus would not align with the corrective measures in the IPG.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy