Which scenario would NOT constitute Fraud?

The scenario where a player mistakes a rule without intent to deceive does not constitute fraud because fraud involves the intention to mislead or deceive another player. In this case, the player is acting based on a misunderstanding rather than a deliberate effort to gain an unfair advantage. Therefore, the absence of intent to deceive is crucial in determining that this scenario does not meet the criteria for fraud.

In contrast, the other scenarios involved intentional actions that seek to misrepresent or alter the game's outcomes for personal benefit. For instance, knowingly misrepresenting a board state (like hiding or manipulating information) and intentionally drawing extra cards both showcase an intent to deceive, which directly aligns with fraudulent behavior. Using a restricted card can also be seen as a deliberate act to gain an unfair advantage, as it goes against established rules regarding card usage in sanctioned play.