Which types of infractions should a judge focus on first if they suspect intentional actions?

When a judge suspects intentional actions during a game, the focus should be on infractions related to cheating or unsporting conduct. These types of infractions are serious as they directly contradict the spirit of fair play and the integrity of the game. Cheating can involve actions such as deliberately manipulating the game state, misrepresenting rules, or other dishonest behavior aimed at gaining an unfair advantage.

Addressing these infractions promptly is crucial to maintaining a fair environment for all players. If a judge perceives that a player may be acting with intent to deceive, prioritizing investigations into possible cheating or unsporting conduct helps ensure the integrity of the event and protects honest players.

On the other hand, minor mistakes in play, time-related infractions, and incorrect deck construction issues, while important to address, don't necessarily indicate harmful intent and will usually follow a different process in terms of their management and consequences. Thus, focusing first on cheating or unsporting conduct is essential when there is a possibility of intentional wrongdoing.